developments
SEARCH  
 

ARCHIVE FOR JULY 2007

NJ DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION RELEASES FIRST SET OF QSAC REVIEWS (7/25/2007)

After examining the QSAC monitoring reports of seven state-operated and Level II districts, education commissioner Lucille Davy has recommended that certain key components of school district operations of Jersey City and Newark school districts be returned to local control.  Jersey City has been under state control since 1989, and Newark since 1995.

The reviews consist of the results of the District Performance Review, or DPR, which was completed for each district by an outside team of experts.  The DPR is a checklist of approximately 350 items in five categories:  governance, fiscal management, personnel, instruction and program, and operations management.  A district must meet more than 80 percent of the indicators in a particular area to be considered “high performing.”  If a district achieves between 50 and 80 percent of the indicators, they must file a corrective action plan with the Department of Education.  If a district meets less than 50 percent of the indicators in an area, the Department will work with the district to identify problems and provide solutions, one of which may be to recommend state intervention.  The Jersey City school district was found to be high performing in governance (89 percent) and financial operations (92 percent), whereas Newark was found to be high performing in operations management (86 percent).  Commissioner Davy has recommended that these functions be returned to local control.

Completed QSAC reports for Asbury Park, Camden, Irvington, Salem City and Trenton have been released as well (reports for Atlantic City and Paterson will be released shortly).  Results for these districts were mixed--Salem City received high performing results in operations management and fiscal management, and mid-level performance in the remaining areas, while Camden received below 50 percent in all five indicators (a link to the page containing the full report of each district is below).

For more information on QSAC, see the Institute’s report NJ QSAC:  2006 Pilot Program Evaluation, as well as the pamphlet QSAC:  A Guide for School Officials and the Public.

Related Documents:

NJDOE:  NJ Quality Single Accountability Continuum, Evaluation Team Reports (7/24/2007)

 


ARCHIVES

October 2013
February 2012
October 2011
June 2011
May 2011
March 2011
February 2011
October 2010
August 2010
May 2010
October 2009
September 2009
May 2009
April 2009
November 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005